Six microstructure measures, one composite — and the venue-cap puzzle
Bid-ask spread, zero-trading-day frequency, Amihud, Roll, Pastor-Stambaugh γ, Corwin-Schultz, plus a composite z-index across the BondSpot panel from 2005 to today. Aggregate term premia absorb supply pressure that the venue-capped bid-ask spread cannot show.
The microstructure literature has accumulated about a dozen liquidity measures, each capturing a different facet — quoted spread, no-trade frequency, price impact per unit traded, autocovariance-based implicit spread, high-low spread, return-on-flow regression. Six are usable on the Polish BondSpot panel without proprietary order-book data: bid-ask spread (BAS), zero-trading-day share (ZTD), Amihud (2002) ratio, Roll (1984) implicit spread, Corwin-Schultz (2012) high-low spread, and a Pastor-Stambaugh-style γ. We aggregate them into a single composite z-index for cross-section monitoring.
Two empirical regularities deserve attention. The first is a familiar one: liquidity measures are highly correlated within the cross-section but diverge sharply on stress-test dates such as the 2008-09 crisis, the May 2013 taper tantrum, the March 2020 COVID dislocation, and the 2022 inflation surge. The composite z-index spikes on each of those events, with magnitudes ranging from +1.2 (taper) to +3.1 (COVID).
The second regularity is genuinely new and is the venue-cap puzzle. Aggregate Polish bid-ask spreads do not respond to changes in total outstanding sovereign debt or to changes in the foreign-investor share, even when both are large. The same shocks load strongly and significantly on Adrian-Crump-Moench term premia at the 2-, 5-, and 10-year horizon. The mechanism is institutional: BondSpot Annex G caps the maximum bid-ask spread that a market-maker can quote, so quoted BAS is mechanically bounded above and cannot widen further when the marginal holder bears more inventory risk. The term premium is free.
Figure · Composite liquidity z-index, monthly mean across the BondSpot panel, 2005-2026
Composite liquidity z-index, mean across the BondSpot bond cross-section each month, 2005–2026. The composite is the standardised mean of BAS, ZTD share, Amihud, Roll, γ and Corwin-Schultz. Positive values indicate less liquid markets relative to the panel-period mean. Spikes line up cleanly with the four major stress episodes of the sample period.
Variable
Median BAS (bp)
Median Amihud
Mean ZTD (%)
Composite z-mean
2005-2007 (pre-GFC calm)
3.2
0.04
14
−0.4
2008-2009 (GFC)
9.1
0.18
35
+1.7
2010-2019 (calm)
4.6
0.07
22
−0.2
Mar–Jun 2020 (COVID)
14.8
0.31
48
+3.1
2021-2022 (inflation surge)
7.3
0.13
30
+0.9
2023-2026 (post-shock)
5.1
0.08
25
+0.1
The venue-cap finding has a direct policy implication: the Polish Ministry of Finance and Narodowy Bank Polski cannot use BondSpot bid-ask spreads as a real-time stress signal for the long end of the curve, because the cap binds. A composite z-index that puts weight on Amihud, Roll, ZTD and γ is informative; the headline BAS in isolation is not. The aggregate term premium is the cleaner signal for supply-side stress, but it requires a curve-fit and a no-arbitrage model and is therefore only available with a one-day lag and a non-trivial methodology.
For practitioners and policy users, the practical recommendation is to monitor the composite z-index daily and to cross-reference against the BRW 5-year and 10-year term premia at month-ends. The two together cover the venue-cap blind spot.
What this means for practitioners
Quoted bid-ask spreads on Polish sovereigns are bounded above by venue rules and underestimate stress at the long end. Use the composite liquidity z-index plus the BRW term premium as the joint stress indicator. Both are published daily on this site and are downloadable as CSV.
Underlying paper: Dec, M. (2026). Polish Sovereign Bond Liquidity: Replication, Extension, and the Supply Channel. liquidity_paper_v5, in submission to Empirical Economics. See the liquidity dashboard for the live monthly series and Table 6 for the supply-block regressions.
Comments
Comments are GitHub Discussions on the public yieldcartography/yield-cartography_site repo. Sign in with GitHub to post.